Wisconsin Supreme Court allows Osceola Bluffs development to proceed

State’s highest court agrees that new law prevents public from suing to stop development.

By

/

/

2 minute read

Mock-up of Osceola Bluffs apartment building (Courtesy Gaughan Cos.)

The Wisconsin Supreme Court has refused to hear the case of the controversial Osceola Bluffs development proposed on the St. Croix River in Osceola, Wis. The decision upholds a Court of Appeals ruling that overturned a lower court decision, and should clear the way for the apartment building construction to move ahead.

As before, the crux of the decision came down to a 2023 law that has significantly limited who is qualified to sue over development projects in the state. The law was intended to reduce local opposition to residential constructio as a means to expand housing. By disqualifying the plaintiffs, the decision has pre-empted concerns about the project’s impact on the river, the process the Osceola Village Council used to approve the proposal, and previous state laws intended to protect the St. Croix.

The Village celebrated the decision in a statement.

“We are pleased with the court’s decision and look forward to moving ahead with the Osceola Bluffs development,” said administrator Devin Swanberg. “This project represents significant economic and community benefits for the Village, and we’re excited to take the next steps.”

The day after the Supreme Court’s decision, the Polk County Circuit Court followed its orders, dismissed the case, and lifted a restraining order that prevented work on the project while the case was being considered.

It is now unclear how any development that would be visible from the St. Croix River could be blocked. When the St. Croix River was designated by the federal government as Wild and Scenic in the 1960s and 1970s, the state of Wisconsin followed suit by passing laws intended to bolster protection. While those laws remain on the books, if the public is not allowed to bring a lawsuit against projects that violate the statutes, their power is effectively removed.

“Ironically, because the decision is based on standing, the Wis. circuit court’s decision that the city of Osceola improperly granted zoning permissions for this development has not been reviewed on its merits,” Einar E. Hanson, an attorney and board member of the Wild Rivers Conservancy, told the Pioneer Press.

A representative of Gaughan Cos., the Forest Lake, MN-based developer behind the proposal, also told the newspaper they anticipate breaking ground this year.


Comments

St. Croix 360 offers commenting to support productive discussion. We don’t allow name-calling, personal attacks, or misinformation. This discussion may be heavily moderated and we reserve the right to block nonconstructive comments. Please: Be kind, give others the benefit of the doubt, read the article closely, check your assumptions, and stay curious. Thank you!

“Opinion is really the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires no accountability, no understanding.” – Bill Bullard

10 responses to “Wisconsin Supreme Court allows Osceola Bluffs development to proceed”

  1. Gil Gragert Avatar
    Gil Gragert

    Whether the law supports it or not, community members have the right to voice their opposition to such a dramatic change in their community. Also, this development should be reviewed through the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act before it can move forward.

    9
  2. Dan Carlson Avatar
    Dan Carlson

    Bad call. There’s more than 1 place to develop housing, but there’s only 1 St. Croix River. A precedent-establishing ruling that will detrimentally affect protection efforts for the river deemed Wild and Scenic. MAGA is on a roll…

    2
    1. bj Avatar
      bj

      Has nothing to do with MAGA. What’s the matter with you? Please take your partisan politics elsewhere…

      3
  3. Scott M Fearing Avatar

    This is sad… why do we no longer respect the natural world – what’s next for the St Croix? Speed boats with loud smelly motors?

    4
  4. bj Avatar
    bj

    Hopefully, Osceola voters clean house in the next election. It’s clear that the City Council does not respect the wishes of their constituents. Could money be involved???

    2
  5. PR Avatar
    PR

    New development may be inviting but we need to protect the St. Croix River form development that detracts from its wild and scenic beauty!

    4
  6. Karl H Avatar
    Karl H

    Wild and Scenic Rivers Act? Phh. say the courts. … based on a law meant to build more affordable housing!

    1. bj Avatar
      bj

      I’m fairly certain that this development does not include affordable housing…

      1
  7. Mary Avatar
    Mary

    What a shame! Business and money-making seem to trump everything else. This is a scenic waterway. Who wants to see apartments as they canoe by?

    3
    1. Dianne Polasik Avatar
      Dianne Polasik

      Wisconsin was partner to The Wild and Scenic River Act ensuring lasting scenic protection to the St Croix River. Until they were not. For one apartment building?

      5

Comment