Key questions about Keystone Woods wildlife area comes down to canines

Hunting dog enthusiasts seek broad exemptions to rules for training and other off-leash events.

By

/

/

5 minute read

Barker Lake, Keystone Woods WMA. (Greg Seitz/St. Croix 360)

As the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources weighs future management of the new 1,800-acre Keystone Woods Wildlife Management Area in the lower St. Croix River watershed, one big issue is a request by a hunting dog organization for special exemptions to train their dogs off-leash for much of the year on the property. They would also like to hold special events and competitions on the site.

The Minnesota Federation of Field Trail Clubs (MFFTC) represents groups that trained their dogs and held events at the site when it was private property. The state acquired it for approximately $27 million in 2023.

In a 2023 letter responding to an early draft of the management plan, the Minnesota Federation of Field Trial Clubs urged the DNR to consider allowing extensive exclusive use of the property for dog training. They sought to have at least a quarter of the property designated for their use, managed to reduce its suitability for bird nesting, and to allow off-leash activity around the year.

“Designated grounds will minimize wildlife disturbance and allow participants to easily identify boundaries where training is permitted (very helpful to a new user),” the organization wrote. “Furthermore, wise choices in grass planting (short and sparse growing varieties) in the designated training areas will minimize encounters with nesting birds. Year-round accessibility keeps options open for those developing a young dog — and provides a maintenance outlet for those with an experienced hunting companion.”

While MFFTC said that would leave three-quarters of the property available for wildlife production, they also asked about allowing off-leash activities on additional land. “In particular, the area south and west of Barker Lake fits our clubs needs very well,” the group wrote.

Leash limitations

Map of Keystone Woods Wildlife Management Area. (Greg Seitz/St. Croix 360)

Visitors to Wildlife Management Areas are allowed to let their dogs off-leash during certain times of the year, primarily to facilitate hunting. But dogs are generally required to remain leashed between April 15 and July 15, which helps prevent them from killing or disturbing nesting birds. The MFFTC is asking for broad exemptions from those rules.

The primary purpose of Minnesota’s Wildlife Management Areas is “to protect those lands and waters that have a high potential for wildlife production, public hunting, trapping, fishing, and other compatible recreational uses,” according to the DNR.

Allowing dogs to be off-leash during nesting season is a known hazard to bird survival. Dogs can not only kill parents, eggs, and nestlings, but also simply disturb, exhaust, and stress birds to a dangerous extent.

One example of a ground-nesting grassland bird is the short-eared owl. St. Croix 360 published an article about observing the imperiled species at Keystone Woods last fall, which in turn has inspired many others to visit and see the rare birds for themselves. (More on that below.)

Short-eared owls at Keystone Woods WMA. (Greg Seitz/St. Croix 360)

The DNR acknowledges it has already told dog groups that it will accommodate training and field trials at Keystone Woods. In its survey to collect public input on management, the agency included two questions on the topic:

  • “This property had a history of dog training and trialing when it was in private ownership. The DNR has committed to continuing this activity in some capacity. In 2024, the Minnesota Federation of Field Trial Clubs had a lease within a specified area of Keystone Woods WMA to train dogs for field trialing. What should the DNR consider when determining future dog training and trialing leases?”
  • “What are your thoughts on allowing the public to use a specified area of Keystone Woods WMA for off-leash dog training during the summer months? This would mean allowing dogs to be off leash during a time when they are normally required to be leashed on WMAs (from April 15 to July 15 due to bird nesting season), and potentially allow for the use of blank ammunition, dummy launchers, or similar allowances not typical for a WMA.”

Meanwhile, the local organization Pollinator Friendly Alliance is urging the DNR to take bold steps to protect the property and its unique ecosystem. In an email to supporters, the group suggested five steps the agency should take:

  1. Designate half the land as a Scientific and Natural Area.
  2. Install a good deal of signage along the public/private border to keep hunters off private land.
  3. Erect signage at the parking areas to educate hunters about protected species including trumpeter swans and short-eared owls.
  4. Limit the number of hunters and trappers allowed in the WMA at one time.
  5. Prohibit the use of lead shot.

Meetings and comments

Keystone Woods WMA. (Greg Seitz/St. Croix 360)

A public comment period on the management of Keystone Woods is open until March 2. A special DNR website has additional information.

According to the Minnesota Field Trials and Training Club, it is encouraging its members to comment and attend upcoming public meetings to advocate for permissive dog regulations.

Webinar

Get an overview of Keystone Woods WMA and find out more about the planning process and potential opportunities for this new wildlife management area. There will be opportunities to ask questions and provide comments.

  • 6 p.m.
  • Wednesday, Feb. 12
  • Password: keystone

Join


Join by phone: 855-282-6330
Webinar number: 249 777 48065
Access code: 53978663

In-person public meeting

Get an overview of Keystone Woods WMA and find out more about the planning process and potential opportunities for this new wildlife management area. There will be opportunities to ask questions and provide comments.

  • 6 p.m.
  • Thursday, Feb. 13
  • Hugo City Hall opens in a new browser tab
  • 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N
  • Hugo

Online questionnaire

Your answers to a short questionnaire about interests, concerns and activites will help the DNR determine what opportunities Keystone Woods WMA will offer. Open through Sunday, March 2
Answer questions

Written comments

Email comments
northmetro.wildlife@state.mn.us
Mail comments to:
Keystone Woods WMA input
Minnesota DNR
546-C West Broadway Ave.
Forest Lake, MN 55025

Keystone quotes

Thank you to Mary Divine at the St. Paul Pioneer Press for including St. Croix 360 in her recent story about Keystone Woods:

“Greg Seitz, founder, editor and publisher of St. Croix 360, an independent online news source that covers the 7,700-mile St. Croix watershed, spotted a pair of short-eared owls at Keystone Woods just a few days after the WMA opened to the public in October.

‘Another hiker was walking in front of me, and I think he flushed them up,’ said Seitz, an avid amateur birder. ‘This was a ‘lifer’ species for me and, incidentally, the 150th species of bird I’ve observed in the St. Croix River watershed.’

Seitz reported the sighting to eBird, an online database maintained by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, and wrote about it in St. Croix 360, and visitors began flocking to Keystone Woods to see the owls in person, he said.

‘Seeing those owls was confirmation that this really was a place worth protecting,’ Seitz said. ‘It’s a unique habitat in that it’s a really large grassland, which is what those owls need.’”

New Keystone Woods WMA is already popular with birders. What else should happen there? – Feb. 2, 2025


Comments

St. Croix 360 offers commenting to support productive discussion. We don’t allow name-calling, personal attacks, or misinformation. This discussion may be heavily moderated and we reserve the right to block nonconstructive comments. Please: Be kind, give others the benefit of the doubt, read the article closely, check your assumptions, and stay curious. Thank you!

“Opinion is really the lowest form of human knowledge. It requires no accountability, no understanding.” – Bill Bullard

9 responses to “Key questions about Keystone Woods wildlife area comes down to canines”

  1. softlybrief04086eaee3 Avatar
    softlybrief04086eaee3

    I really don’t see positive outcomes in allowing off lease dogs and this club to continue use the land. Especially the area, south of Barkers Lake, in which they said would fit their needs. This is an area that Short Eared Owls and other ground nesting birds such as Meadowlarks, have been using.
    Also, by allowing groups to have special access, doesn’t seem fair.

    6
  2. C. Stokes Avatar
    C. Stokes

    very nice article but it doesn’t mention that individual’s and clubs have been training dogs and holding tests on what was Kelley Farms for over 60 years. The carve out areas being proposed seem like a very sensible compromise to allow all types of activities. And I can say in the time I have been using the farm for training and running tests, I have never seen a dog come back with a nesting bird or a wild bird at all. our training and testing is very controlled. The dogs are not just running loose. And one more thing; Those short-eared owls would not be there if dog training had disturbed there nesting.
    I believe there is room for many varied uses.

    9
  3. W Thompson Avatar
    W Thompson

    After spending $23 million dollars of the state’s money only to turn around and hand part of the land to a dog club sounds wrong to me. Is the cub paying for that use of public land?

    5
  4. Troy Howard Avatar
    Troy Howard

    WMA’s are not really supposed to be used for this purpose. I see no sense in watering down the purpose of WMA’s just because it is near the Twin Cities. No SNA period!!!

    Troy

    2
  5. Boz M Avatar
    Boz M

    “I’ve never seen a dog come back with a nesting bird…” That’s not the point. The noise, commotion and dogs are seen as predators by the birds and wildlife that occupy these grasslands. Nesting time is particularly a bad idea. Surveys by the National Wildlife Foundation and other watchdogs have shown the sharp decline of all grassland birds. There will be no Meadowlarks, Bobolinks or prairie sparrows nesting near the disturbance this would cause. Nothing against hunting, but I don’t need to hear gunshots while I’m hiking down a trail.

    3
  6. Susan R Avatar
    Susan R

    Because this is state land that belongs to all of us — and it’s important to meet the needs of all Minnesotans — I fully support carving out space for continued off-leash dog activities that have been occurring here for decades. However, because it is state land that belongs to all of us, I would advocate that space for off-leash dog activity should be open to all – not just to members of a specific organization.

    1
  7. Boz Metzdorf Avatar
    Boz Metzdorf

    Nothing against dogs or hunting, but not a good idea. This is grassland habitat that supports birds that are in steep decline, that is: Meadowlarks, Bobolinks (threatened) and grassland sparrows. All birds are in decline but especially these species. All this activity is a disturbance to nesting birds and the timing (April-July) is peak nesting. Surely, there must be other places to train dogs than a wildlife management area.

    3
  8. […] and this accommodation does not align with the DNR’s standard practices.  Here is a link to an article that provides more […]

  9. Paul Spreitzer Avatar
    Paul Spreitzer

    60 years as a hunting dog training area is a lot of history, and I acknowledge that the prospect of this ending would be a hardship to the clubs and individuals who have used this area.
    However, allowing state (public) lands to be subdivided or parceled off to be used for activities that are both disruptive to wildlife and contrary to the purpose of WMAs is wrongheaded. There are too many postage-stamp-sized lots set aside for wildlife already, and we know that they are not sufficient to maintain, let alone improve, threatened populations.
    There should be no room for compromise here, especially during breeding season — not because I am against hunting or training dogs for that purpose, but because this is an uncommon opportunity to reclaim and protect habitat for some species that have been “compromised” to near extirpation.

Comment